Start Asking Questions
Open letter to members of the PSNI
June 6 2021
I’m not a detective or anything, but I have seen an overwhelming amount of evidence of crimes and breaches of our constitutional rights being committed by the government over the last 15 months. I’m fairly sure that some rank and file policemen & policewomen have witnessed the same. The PSNI being used as a political tool instead of a police force. Having to enforce the new “rule of six” and such nonsense. Investigating if people were "illegally" visiting their parents or grandparents. Used as pawns to enforce fines based on new emergency legislation that defies any reasonable logic. All while your own families were also confined under virtual home arrest. Used to breach common law and the basic human rights that you took an oath to uphold.
“I hereby do solemnly and sincerely and truly declare and affirm that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all individuals and their traditions and beliefs; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof according to law”
A psychological war of terror and panic has been waged against the citizens of the UK. Do you feel the government has broken your trust? Being mandated to wear face masks, even when driving? dangerously restricting your oxygen levels in your blood! The Government has failed it’s electorate, it is acting in an illegal, unlawful and treasonous way, taking away our basic human rights. It has used a massive propaganda war to promote a new experimental gene therapy as our only way out of the "pandemic" using subliminal behavioral psychology to pressure us into accepting to be part of a this drug trial, without providing us with any informed consent, which is illegal under the Nuremberg code article
1:
"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential"
There is a massive big clue, that points straight towards the perpetrators. It points to the very rotten core of our Government. The coronavirus act, allowing the change in law to grant complete “Immunity” from civil liability. This points to the fact that these crimes were premeditated. A good Forensic computer analyst would quickly find evidence of preplanning. No one is above the Law. Everyone can be held accountable for their actions and every man, woman or child that has suffered a wrong has the right to a lawful remedy. We have Constitutional laws to protect us from an Illegal government's Acts. Our government are not above the law. Ignorance is not a defence.
Evidence of crimes:
Proof of Covid-19 testing kits patented in October 2015.
Proof of Covid-19 kits being exported in 2017.
Proof of manipulated PCR test results to inflate death statistics. Using flawed WHO guidelines.
Evidence of Malpractice being carried out against our pensioners, causing serious injuries and deaths.
Wilfully placing untested, infected patients back into carehomes, enabling the spread of viruses among pensioners, again causing deaths and serious injuries.
illegal placing of Do Not Revive orders on patients with learning difficulties.
Falsification of death certificates.
"I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation" Michael Yeadon Ph.D.
Examples of breaches of our Human Rights:
Article 3:
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Our liberty was taken away under the false guise of a pandemic.
Article 5:
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
We have been subjugated to a constant psychological war from our government. Which has been acting in an illegal and treasonous manner, causing fear and widespread panic in a cruel, inhumane and degrading way. Based on false science and subterfuge.
There is a definite case of misinformation going on, an obvious omission of facts. The amount of serious side effects reported including, many thousands of Deaths, Anaphylaxis, Heart attacks, myocarditis/pericarditis, Bells Palsy, Strokes etc. These injuries are from ALL of the Novel Vaccines. The silence of the press in all of these cases is a sign of complicity. What I also find alarming is the BBC’s advice to pregnant women to take the vaccine. The 16th April 2021 story stating “Pregnant women should be offered Covid vaccine” They go on to state “Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are preferable because data from the US in 90,000 pregnant women has not raised any safety concerns” How can a state broadcaster make these claims when there is proof of at least 571 Miscarriages, the numbers have been steadily increasing, now averaging 60 per week for the USA alone! Nearly every single expectant mother had the “Pfizer or Moderna vaccine” that the BBC stated were safe? How many expectant mothers in the UK have suffered miscarriages acting on this information from the trusted BBC? The great "impartial" broadcasting giant, once respected as an honest source of information, now totally corrupted by money and private influence. Rolling a glossy white coat of paint over any stories that does not agree with it's agenda. Over 25,000 people outside BBC headquarters, paint bombing it's Prospero and Ariel statue while shouting "Shame on you" "Shame on you" wasn't a big enough news story to report, even though it reported a few hundred people protesting in Belgrade.
Nuremberg Code
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probably cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.