PCR Fraud

A groundbreaking peer-reviewed study from Germany has just refuted the scientific basis used to justify lockdowns, social distancing rules, and mandatory vaccinations. (cf. frontiersin.org) The researchers analyzed data from the „Accredited Laboratories in Medicine“ (ALM) – a nationwide consortium of officially accredited medical laboratories that carried out around 90% of all SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests in Germany between 2020 and 2023.

When the researchers compared the weekly PCR positivity rates of the ALM with data from the IgG antibody tests of the same laboratories –which essentially measured who had actually developed immunity triggered by the infection–, they made a startling discovery:

Only about 14% of those who had a positive PCR test in the early phase of the „pandemic“ (2020–mid-2021) actually produced antibodies – meaning that most early „cases“ were never real infections.

Even under the most conservative assumptions – taking into account a possible overrepresentation of IgG-positive individuals in the sample – the actual infection rate fell to about 10%. This means that almost 90% of the PCR-positive findings were false or non-infectious, and often they were simply remaining RNA fragments amplified at CT thresholds of 35–45.

What that means

• Mass PCR tests have massively increased the number of cases worldwide. Any country that used similar CT thresholds probably overestimated the number of „infections“ by an order of magnitude.

• Lockdowns and regulations were based on an incorrect metric. The German „7-day incidence rate“ that served as the trigger for restrictions was statistically meaningless – and the same logic applied in the USA, Great Britain and elsewhere. In America, the entire campaign „15 Days to Slow the Spread“ was based on the same inflated PCR fraud.

• The authorities suppressed representative serological data. The German RKI and the Ministry of Health had access to these ALM antibody results, but despite their political relevance, they never published them.

• The rewriting of „pandemic“ history. If only 10–14% of the PCR „cases“ reported in the first year reflected genuine infections, then the infection-mortality rate, transmission models, and emergency declarations all rested on sand. At the end of 2020 – months before the start of vaccinations–, about a quarter of the German population already had natural antibodies. In other words, while the authorities declared a crisis out of control, herd immunity was already developing. At the end of 2021, almost the entire population was IgG-positive. The evidence shows that pandemic policy was not determined by the actual infection situation, but by a diagnostic illusion.

PCR technology and test thresholds have been standardized in all WHO member states. This means that the same bias probably occurred everywhere – a systemic diagnostic exaggeration that may represent the biggest fraud in the history of public health.

These tactics were probably used to stoke fears and thus increase the acceptance of lockdowns and experimental, gene-based „vaccines“. This was done by Gao et al. demonstrated, who found that public fear of COVID-19 (PFC) at the county level correlated positively with the number of COVID-19 vaccinations:

If the PFC increases from 0 to 300, the predicted number of vaccinations increases from 10,000 to 230,000. (See also. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

This is consistent with fraudulent attempts to artificially inflate the number of COVID-19 deaths. Basoulis et al. found that 45.3% of „COVID-19 deaths“ in Greece were not actually due to COVID-19:

Ultimately, although the majority of the population came into contact with the artificially produced virus and formed antibodies – the PCR data used to justify worldwide lockdowns, fear-mongering, and mandatory vaccinations were a complete fraud. Accountability is required. (See also. whitehouse.gov)